What are some misconceptions people have about Mia Khalifa, and how do you think she addresses them?

Veronicadavis

Member
Banned
Joined
Jul 8, 2024
Messages
7
Trophies
0
Many people have misconceptions about Mia Khalifa, thinking she made a lot of money from her brief career in adult entertainment or that she still supports that industry. In reality, she has spoken out about how little she earned and how she regrets her involvement. Mia uses social media and interviews to address these misunderstandings and to share her real story, aiming to change how people view and talk about the industry and its performers.
 
Emm... who? But more importantly, who cares?

I don't understand why folk post this random, oddly specific bullshit here all the time. Some random woman (Who I am not going to Google, just so you know) who did porn isn't a discussion one qyickly associates with a gaming forum. It's like your determined to defend critisisum of this person that hasn't even happened, at least not here. Not to mention you defending her against something that doesn't need defending. Grown adults can make money however they want so long as it is legal, consensual and the have not been manipulated into it.
 
Lets understand something, this is kind of a hard topic and there is a lot to unpack ( ground work ).

I am going to keep it short.
“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—for ever.” - "1984"

From the perspective, your not getting hurt, but in reality somewhere around the globe somebody is hurting. We have to think in terms of colonization, exploration, exploitation, Columbus,
and of course Imperial Britain.

Imperial Army is part of Imperialism. Where they force people from other cultures to accept there ways. It is the same when colonist from Europe, would argue with a Native American about the name of Maze. But imagine that colonist pointing a gun ( holding hostage ) that native and telling them it is corn.

Why isn't Priya Rai in the news? Priya Rai never, ever, allow anybody to touch her body during anything on camera at all. In fact she originally wanted to be a professional model, but nobody cared about her at all. So she literally stripped down in front of the camera, doing tasteful photos in a variety of locations, and positions. She is following the customs of her people while being a model, being suggestively naked. Even within reach of men nearby her. Not once did she dawn a hijab, represent herself as Native-American, or anything outside of her culture. Asides the India national flag. Even more from that is another PVC dressed entertainer from India ( who name escapes me but I have her picture next to her mother ), point being is that she is still following rules of her culture, thus paying respect to her land, and this I learned from a book about "Globalism" you most likely will read during College English II.

Since we are on the topic of "Indian", in college and even searching for employment. I have come across many Native American related women. Most of them are not "showy", despite others who do work where there legs are exposed. They do not resemble the people from India at all. In fact you could possible say they are ugly ( because of alien or not so well known features, ) if any at all. That is the truth about "Native American" people. Not all tribes have those genes, if any has been corrupted by race mixing.

What Mia Khalifa is doing is like if a person grew up in a Catholic family, only to raise children who might identify as Christian, but then be faced with the presence of predators, outside of there religion. How long before that is broken, and what was Catholic or even Christian remains at all. Most Christians do not even know the difference between Catholic and Christianity in general. So when "Public Opinion" in the 1960's happen where a Jew-girl ( Gloria Steinem ) declares "I got an abortion and feel great" within the head-lines. Does it mention that she slept with men of her "people/religion" ? Does it mention that these people was CIA, and Newspaper CEO's ? No, No, and No. The headline just shows somebody who most likely is American citizen, talking big about abortion. If those facts was presented at the time. Nobody would care and laugh at the whole thing as a joke. Point being in my own opinion, if we had trends like LGBT, Abortion, and hiring women over men, most of us would not be here at all. That is the weakening of our belief systems. So looking at India with Mia Khalifa and how much was robbed from it. There is a big difference. It is like this man who searched for his long-lost father ( on youtube ). Only to find out that if he had brought home his blonde mother to his Arabic, Islam world. Only to find out that she is not following there ways, and her natural appearance. At the time, it would have not been accepted. While it is more open nowadays, it was like an insult back then. His father would have to reject his entire nation, and possibly be banned from associating with his family at all.

A great example is Sheila Marie. She is clearly "Indian" ( race wise ); but all of that is completely ignored entirely. It is clear that her family history shows problems through and through. From her mother having a relationship with multiple men, and her father being in the military. The "Flower" cult mentalities of her time, into literal normality of that life-style itself. She has been in adult-entertainment for years but only recently has been doing pornography. Of course she started as a model.

The point being in a world where Europeans ( the master and his tools ) are glob-trotting, planting the flag. Even in "Triangle Trade" where the icon/flag for it is literally three nudes of different races bearing resources. The horrors that India had to endure, including abuse the Philippines, had to go through during that time. Mia Khalifa represents the result of that.

Honestly her movies are not so great but her body is alright. Again it is like a slap to Islam, Middle-East, India, Hinduism, and honestly has created "inuenudu" or even fetish among Muslims, and non-Muslims. Avena Lee is another example of this problem. Why? Avena literally had a father who was wealthy and influenced enough to send her daughter to the highest and brightest schools. However Avena Lee was not the greatest student and even worst gravitated towards hip-hop, due to growing up in lower-income properties ( Gramacy Complex??? ) where she was obviously welcomed. In my opinion being in NYC it is easy to have an Asian girlfriend ( of course she is Japanese related ). That being said for income she did xxx. She is still content, but the reality is that they want her for the party. Just like many others from the mid 2000's are still traveling the world, in favor of being "a wanted" person of interest. It is the same reason why a model or actress would be seen across the globe, and literally in the same sphere as human-trafficking. Like that witch Stormy Daniels said "I did not want to have sex with him, but I had to". As long as the flow of income does not stop, they will be the way they are. The girl at the party dancing up with yuppie-scum who has to pay for sex.....of course paying for sex does not count, but these guys do not care at this point, because they would probably end up like the "Santa Barbara Rampage Killer Identified as Elliot Rodger, the Son of 'Hunger Games'' Assistant Director. "Peter Anthony Rodger" Elliot Rodger would not accept his place in the world, as a guy who would end up using money to associate with the opposite sex at all. Not to feed the "whore" ( Jezebel ).

She is from an ideal wholesome family, and out of nowhere just makes this choice to be taken advantage of. She is a marketeer, a brand-ambassador, an influence-er, a groomer, a person who says "I did it and I am perfectly fine", but it is her job. She is making positive headlines because she will inspire others.

That being said being apart a culture, race, or religion only to be rejected for your activities. Even more so when you body is being "used" by a random stranger, who has a larger then normal body-parts, leaving the person with "discharge" and the flat-fact that it ( the vessel/body ) will never be the same. Imagine when she wants to settle-down and have children, only to be honest to her "true love" and tell them about the adventures she had, and then be turned down by that man, and the next kind of guy she wants to spend the rest of her life with. You think "he would never know" but in reality most men ( especially today ) are not willing to be robbed of such. We are not our parents. Imagine somebody being used like a handkerchief, put on display, only to be passed down to the next person, despite how "clean" that handkerchief is. Imagine the man who worked his life to the bone just to have barely anything; only to be given the leftovers of life, and ( and ) be suckered into not even sloppy-seconds.

It is like if Johnny Depp married Amber Heard and she literally inside a bunch of xxx movies, and he had relations with her like how Fry from "Futurama" almost had relations with a mermaid. Then she gives him the bs ( which she was sued 50 million for things she wrote that was not true at all, but the limit was 10 million due to the states limitation ).

Imagine all the poor bastards out there, who barely had any real sex at all. Only to be crucified because of something that person endured, enjoyed, and made a living out of prior. That is like buying a sports car, and then being told never to drive above 20mph with it, or you would be fined. That is no way to live. Yes women are at fault as well, because she might be nice only until she is married and have a couple of kids.

Again culture wise, accepting her nature as the norm, means that even a child born into this world would have a faith similar or even more then what she had before. You see the camera, creative and all, fun and games, but how many times does "fun" becomes wiping a boot with dog-doo on a fine, white rug.

Do whatever you want but remember...

“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—for ever.” -- A former police officer, and writer of "1984", George Orwell.

Imagine British ruling India ( Including Pakistan ) and then in time she grows up, to be somebody giving joy to random men around the globe. She would be alien to her own culture.
"Hey mom and dad I was used by a million invaders and love every moment of it".

She could have stripped down, and still get away with everything she did, and not parade herself around via intercourse, or any other bodily exchanges. "Only Fans" is literally owned by an Indian person, and is literally the same thing as viewing at a window, with a girl behind it.
 
Last edited:
Emm... who? But more importantly, who cares?

I don't understand why folk post this random, oddly specific bullshit here all the time. Some random woman (Who I am not going to Google, just so you know) who did porn isn't a discussion one qyickly associates with a gaming forum. It's like your determined to defend critisisum of this person that hasn't even happened, at least not here. Not to mention you defending her against something that doesn't need defending. Grown adults can make money however they want so long as it is legal, consensual and the have not been manipulated into it.

I completely agree with you.
I don't understand why this person needs to be defended on this forum. Anyway, if she hadn't entered the industry, she wouldn't have become so well-known and wouldn't have made any money.
 

Latest content

Back
Top