NBC: Why the Strategic National Stockpile isn't meant to solve a crisis like coronavirus


Well-known member
Dec 11, 2018
As health care workers around the country labor under shortages of personal protective equipment, all eyes are on the Strategic National Stockpile — the country's largest repository of drugs and medical equipment for use in a public health crisis.

But the U.S. strategic stockpile isn't intended to be the solution to a crisis. It's designed to be used as a stopgap during emergencies. The stockpile has limited resources, government officials and public health experts say, which weren't at full capacity even before the coronavirus was on the horizon.

"The Strategic National Stockpile is not designed to be the sole solution to these problems," said Greg Burel, who directed the stockpile program for more than 12 years until his long-planned retirement in January. He said the shortages of personal protective equipment across the country — and the fact that states already need items from the stockpile — illustrate a systemwide failure in American health care.

"Right now, all of this market runs on a just-in-time basis, because it is optimized for the best possible cost," he said. "But sometimes getting the best possible cost leaves you in a position that you have the worst possible preparedness."

The Strategic National Stockpile, or SNS, is meant to be used for brief periods until the supply chain resumes normally, other supplies are manufactured or the president invokes the Defense Production Act, which President Donald Trump did Friday, to compel companies to make the most needed supplies.

Formed in 1999, the stockpile employs 200 people who procure, store and distribute materials in times of emergency. Supplies are in "strategically located warehouses throughout the country ready for deployment," although the number of warehouses and their locations are closely guarded secrets for national security reasons, officials with the Department of Health and Human Services told NBC News.

The stockpile wasn't at full capacity before the COVID-19 outbreak in the U.S., in part because it never fully replenished some of the critical supplies used in the 2009 H1N1 pandemic response, Burel said.
During that crisis, at least 25 percent of the supply of antiviral drugs designated for influenza were used, as well as a significant amount of personal protective equipment — the very supplies hospitals are in dire need of right now.

HHS said that it has it has maintained supplies of personal protective equipment in the stockpile and that it has made several additional purchases, but "priorities for SNS inventory are balanced against congressionally available funding and direction."

"That stock was never replenished because we never received additional appropriations," Burel said. "We are not in the optimum situation right now."

It's estimated that $8 billion worth of vaccines, antibiotics, medical equipment and protective supplies are typically in the stockpile, designed to respond to a variety of scenarios. But the stockpile is limited by its annual — and occasionally supplemental — funding from Congress.

"What we try to do in the Strategic National Stockpile is use the appropriated funds that Congress gives us to invest in the best way we can," Burel said. "We are never going to have everything that you would like to have on that shelf. It's just too expensive."

HHS said that it has been "transparent that more supplies are needed" and that it has requested additional funding to procure more and scale up production.

"The role at the federal level is to appropriately implement regulatory relief, provide alternative sources and support manufacturing, and adjust allocation to appropriately target areas in need," the agency said in a statement. "Local hospitals must do their part to make sure product goes where it's needed now rather than being stored where it is not currently needed."


Latest content

General chat
Help Show users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • PGen98 @ PGen98:
    My sister's partner's son is obsessed with the movies and the shows, he's seen absolutely everything and raves about them. Showed me a couple of the movies, and they're definitely decent, but it feels like you're out of the loop if you haven't seen them and try to watch one at random. So need to sort of figure out an order and go with it at some point
  • BigPete7978 @ BigPete7978:
  • BigPete7978 @ BigPete7978:
    This may offer some insight.
  • PGen98 @ PGen98:
  • BigPete7978 @ BigPete7978:
    :) Glad I could help!
  • BigPete7978 @ BigPete7978:
    If you do end up checking any out I would love to hear what you think of some
  • PGen98 @ PGen98:
    Most definitely, much appreciated :)
  • PGen98 @ PGen98:
    Yep, will do!
  • BigPete7978 @ BigPete7978:
    Oh I just figured out you can have the chat in a separate pop up! Amazing!
  • PGen98 @ PGen98:
    Yep, pop-up mode :)
  • PGen98 @ PGen98:
    Very handy when you're browsing through multiple tabs :)
  • S @ Sangay23:
    hello i am Sangay23
  • PGen98 @ PGen98:
    Hi @Sangay23 it's good to meet you :)
  • O @ odrio89:
    hi all
  • A @ Augment:
    Test to see if I can send a link in chat. Imgur: The magic of the Internet
  • A @ Augment:
    Oh hey it worked! This is my db schema so far
  • PGen98 @ PGen98:
    That's a good start!
  • A @ Augment:
    I'm a bit confused what I should do for user/vote relationship. Should it be a one to many from user or a one to one?
  • A @ Augment:
    So that a user can only vote once per thread
  • PGen98 @ PGen98:
    I want to say it's one to one, but in all honesty I'm a bit fuzzy there. I can recommend JoyFreak's sister site AdminIntel - Admin & Webmaster Resource where there are lots for people of varying degrees of expertise with development, you likely can get a far more precise answer there!
  • A @ Augment:
    Wow what a fantastic resource. Thank you very much for the help
  • BigPete7978 @ BigPete7978:
    Hey all!
  • S @ shadowflare014:
    Morning everyone
    S @ shadowflare014: Morning everyone